|
Description:
The original rationale justifying the establishment of many state
park systems was their contributions to economic development. However,
now most state parks are viewed as discretionary services and thus
subjected to disproportionately large funding cuts in times of economic
downturns. This presentation will discuss the approach used by state
parks advocates in Texas to re-establish the position that parks
are potential economic engines, especially in rural areas. Three
strategies were used. First, the economic impact was calculated
in 37 state parks to determine the impact of the parks on the host
counties in which they were located in terms of impact on sales,
impact on residents' income and number of jobs created in the host
counties. These results were compared to the State's budgetary investments
to those parks and then positioned as see money which was highly
leveraged to generate substantial gains in income for residents
in those counties.
The second strategy was to evaluate the
contribution of state parks to the Texas tourism industry. The third
strategy was to estimate the contribution to the state's treasury
that accrued from the sales tax levied on recreation and sporting
equipment. As a result of this approach, the Texas state parks 2004
budget was cut less than 2%, and several legislators used the report
to indicate that they were not going to support budget cuts that
would cause economic hardships in their districts.
This presentation will demonstrate how
to generate data at a relatively low cost to support the economic
case for repositioning parks as economic engines in host communities,
in state tourism, and in contributions to the state treasury through
their role in stimulating sales of equipment. In doing so, a report
can be created to use as a "selling" document with evidence
that advocates could use to lobby legislators and make presentations
to groups in their local communities.
|