|  | 
	
		|  | 
	
		|  | 
 
                 
 | 
  
    |  | Page 4/5 |  |  
    
      Shipping Fees
 It can be a tricky balancing act... You want your eTail site to compete and win  sales, but the cost of shipping may drive customers away.  Shipping and handling fees are one of  the biggest issues that etailers face.  Charge too much and  customers will abandon their shopping carts.  Don’t charge enough to cover your costs and  your venture may fail.  Consider these shipping/handling tips: 
       Avoid overcharging for shipping and handling.  Shipping  and handling fees are  the number one reason that online shoppers  abandon their cart. Aim to break even.
 Consider product weight as a basis for your  fees. The postal carriers and other  shipping companies base fees mostly on weight, so most customers expect this to  be the norm.
  Offer multiple shipping options. You never know how motivated your customer  may be to receive items faster and what the trade-off financially will be to  them.  Consider offering ground transportation, next-day shipping and a two-to-three-day service, as well as  additional international charges where appropriate.
 Use reduced shipping fees for specials and  promotions. Reductions in shipping fees are among the most successful promotions  available to online retailers. Many etailers will charge shipping and handling  for smaller purchases, and offer free shipping on orders over a certain dollar  amount.  This can provide an incentive  for customers to buy more to take advantage of the offer.  Always test shipping fee promotions based on  your most common customers.   Click the "Learn and Interact" image to the right to explore a  global shopping and shipping scenario. Where can you find the best deal?          
 
  
    |  | Page 4/5 |  |  
    
      |  |  
      |  | These materials were developed as part of the Southern Rural Development Center’s Nationall e-Commerce Extension Initiative.  They are based upon work supported by the Cooperative State Research, Education, and Extension Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, under Award No. 2005-45064-03212 
 Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this publication are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the view of the U.S. Department of Agriculture or the Southern Rural Development Center.
 |  |